[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14068063#comment-14068063
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-6260:
-----------------------------------
I've wanted to fix this since 2008. When can it be fixed, never? In 2028?
There is a history and a pattern of pushing back on stuff like this. All it
does is discourage new contributors and hobble willing contributors.
If we changed, would anything crazy or bad happen? No. If we leave it, it's
just a pattern of screwing the project from a high level under the guise of
"small improvements not being worth it".
IMO, this is push back for push backs sake. Forget committing this so that
Tomas can move on and improve the next little thing. Let's tie him up and red
tape and squeeze the life out of him so that he doesn't do anything crazy, like
get a little enthusiasm and momentum on improving our crap load of ugly
technical debt.
> Rename DirectUpdateHandler2
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6260
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 5.0
> Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-6260.patch, SOLR-6260.patch
>
>
> "DirectUpdateHandler" was removed, I think in Solr 4. DirectUpdateHandler2
> should be renamed, at least remove that "2". I don't know really what
> "direct" means here. Maybe it could be renamed to "DefaultUpdateHandler", or
> "UpdateHandlerDefaultImpl", or other good suggestions
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
