[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14069029#comment-14069029
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-6260:
------------------------------------
-1
The benefits to this simple class rename are blown way out of proportion by
fallaciously linking it to real improvements. Further, if you're worried about
attracting new committers, fostering a more civil (and less aggressive and
combative) environment would go a long way.
Although there are multiple minor downsides (countering the minor upside), I'll
remove my -1 if we can at least implement back compat with existing
solrconfigs. It should be trivial.
> Rename DirectUpdateHandler2
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6260
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 5.0
> Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-6260.patch, SOLR-6260.patch
>
>
> "DirectUpdateHandler" was removed, I think in Solr 4. DirectUpdateHandler2
> should be renamed, at least remove that "2". I don't know really what
> "direct" means here. Maybe it could be renamed to "DefaultUpdateHandler", or
> "UpdateHandlerDefaultImpl", or other good suggestions
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
