[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987119#action_12987119
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2883:
-------------------------------------

I'm trying to follow this thread. If I extract the somewhat off topic 
bitterness I seem to see:

1. There is interest in trying to unify function queries again.

2. There is a concern - currently the Solr function queries are part of Solr - 
java code in Solr is changed on a whim. In Lucene, the bar is higher - java 
code is generally considered an impl detail in Solr, unless it's a plugin api. 
This has been an attractive quality in the past. Moving it to Lucene changes it 
to more of a supported API. Valid point if you ask me.

3. A response was made about marking it experimental.

4. A response was made about perhaps internal.

The rest does not add much. We have not voted on this issue - we voted on broad 
topics - to be sorted out as we go. Lets discuss it for a bit before everyone 
just gets pissed off.

> Consolidate Solr  & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list | 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13261.html]  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to