[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987262#action_12987262
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2883:
-----------------------------------------
Really back in the days where stuff like that was moved to solr there was a
good reason for duplicating the func - lucene was on a totally different
release schedule, bw. compat etc. But now since we are aligned with releases
and we have the modules area there is really no good reason for stuff like
that. If solr needs some feature in FuncQuery & friends we are going to add it.
If we can fix it without breaking BWCompat we should do it - if not we discuss
case by case! I have actually written some FuncQuery related code for customers
and they would not be happy if we break bwcompat codewise (I exclude package
naming here) - just saying that keeping it internal so that we can hack it as
we like is not an option anyway!!
just my $0.05
simon
> Consolidate Solr & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2883
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list |
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13261.html]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
