[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987550#action_12987550
 ] 

Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2883:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Function queries (FQs) already have a pretty stable interface and we have 
already worked hard to maintain BWC for them since they are one of the more 
common areas that people actually do extend in Solr. In other words, FQs are 
already more interface than implementation.

YES! +1

bq. As a corollary of that, more light on them will make them better, improve 
performance, etc.
again +1

I think we can maintain the interface and innovations side by side - that said, 
lets look at a patch and discuss further once we see code / moving paths etc.

simon

> Consolidate Solr  & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list | 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13261.html]  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to