> On Jun 2, 2017, at 5:40 PM, Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6/2/2017 10:23 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> I see zero benefits from cutting branch_7x now. Shawn, can you describe why >> you think we should do this? >> >> My interpretation of your argument is that you’re in favor of delaying >> cutting branch_7_0 until feature freeze - which BTW is the status quo - but >> I don’t get why that argues for cutting branch_7x now. > > I think I read something in the message I replied to that wasn't > actually stated. I hate it when I don't read things closely enough. > > I meant to address the idea of making both branch_7x and branch_7_0 at > the same time, whenever the branching happens. Somehow I came up with > the idea that the gist of the discussion included making the branches > now, which I can see is not the case. > > My point, which I think applies equally to branch_7x, is to wait as long > as practical before creating a branch, so that there is as little > backporting as we can manage, particularly minimizing the amount of time > that we have more than two branches being actively changed.
+1 -- Steve www.lucidworks.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
