Hi Anshum, I would like to request you to consider delaying the branch cutting by a bit till we finalize the SOLR-10574 discussions and make the changes. Alternatively, we could backport the changes to that branch after you cut the branch now. Regards, Ishan
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 2, 2017, at 5:40 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > > > > On 6/2/2017 10:23 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > > >> I see zero benefits from cutting branch_7x now. Shawn, can you > describe why you think we should do this? > >> > >> My interpretation of your argument is that you’re in favor of delaying > cutting branch_7_0 until feature freeze - which BTW is the status quo - but > I don’t get why that argues for cutting branch_7x now. > > > > I think I read something in the message I replied to that wasn't > > actually stated. I hate it when I don't read things closely enough. > > > > I meant to address the idea of making both branch_7x and branch_7_0 at > > the same time, whenever the branching happens. Somehow I came up with > > the idea that the gist of the discussion included making the branches > > now, which I can see is not the case. > > > > My point, which I think applies equally to branch_7x, is to wait as long > > as practical before creating a branch, so that there is as little > > backporting as we can manage, particularly minimizing the amount of time > > that we have more than two branches being actively changed. > > +1 > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
