Github user dsmiley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/455#discussion_r228174440
--- Diff: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/AddUpdateCommand.java
---
@@ -262,6 +263,11 @@ private void flattenAnonymous(List<SolrInputDocument>
unwrappedDocs, SolrInputDo
flattenAnonymous(unwrappedDocs, currentDoc, false);
}
+ public String getRouteFieldVal() {
--- End diff --
What code duplication?
I think we need to standardize/harmonize route a bit. Notice UpdateCommand
has setRoute & getRoute. Lets initialize route in the constructor here by the
presence of \_route\_ in the params. Then lets not look for _route_ in params
later since we know we can get it here. Then I think
`org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor#setupRequest(java.lang.String,
org.apache.solr.common.SolrInputDocument)` can be removed and instead insist
everyone call the overloaded version that takes a route, and each caller looks
up the route from the command. It's not clear to me if "null" actually should
be passed to route in any circumstance.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
