So 15% is a quorum for votes. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On May 30, 2022, at 1:14 PM, Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > thank you for participating for this! > > I may need to clarify the local rule I set. > "15 votes" threshold means literally 15 votes, that includes approval(+1), > disapproval(-1), and no opinion(+0). > I don't mean we need 15 approvals or 15 disapprovals to make the dicision - > it could be too high hurdle for both side I think. > > I mean, I need at least "15 participants" who pay attention/take time on it > and decide to cast their valuable votes for this proposal. > > Thanks, > Tomoko > > > 2022年5月31日(火) 4:04 Dragan Ivanovic <dragan.ivano...@uns.ac.rs > <mailto:dragan.ivano...@uns.ac.rs>>: > Hello everyone, > > Not sure whether this email might help you, but let me share the VIVO > community experience with this issue. We have migrated JIRA issues available > at https://vivo-project.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/VIVO/issues/ > <https://vivo-project.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/VIVO/issues/> to > GitHub issues available athttps://github.com/vivo-project/VIVO/issues > <https://github.com/vivo-project/VIVO/issues>. We used a customized version > of this project - https://github.com/rstoyanchev/jira-to-gh-issues > <https://github.com/rstoyanchev/jira-to-gh-issues> (our customization is > available at https://github.com/chenejac/jira-to-gh-issues > <https://github.com/chenejac/jira-to-gh-issues>). Basically, it is possible > to migrate issues, not perfect, but majority of information is there, and we > are happy with our decision to move to GitHub issues. > > Good luck with migration. > > Regards, > > Dragan Ivanovic > > the VIVO tech lead > > On 5/30/2022 8:53 PM, Patrick Zhai wrote: >> Thank you Tomoko for starting the vote, although I didn't participate in the >> last discussion but I'd love to see us moving towards the github issue. >> >> So here's my +1 (committer, non-PMC) >> >> BTW, by "the vote will be effective if it successfully gains more than 15% >> of voters (>= 15) from committers", do you mean to make it successful we >> need to collect 15 "+1" from committers or just 15 votes (regardless of the >> opinion)? >> >> Best >> Patrick >> >> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 8:41 AM Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com >> <mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi everyone! >> >> As we had previous discussion thread [1], I propose migration to GitHub >> issue from Jira. >> It'd be technically possible (see [2] for details) and I think it'd be good >> for the project - not only for welcoming new developers who are not familiar >> with Jira, but also for improving the experiences of long-term >> committers/contributors by consolidating the conversation platform. >> >> You can see a short summary of the discussion, some stats on current Jira >> issues, and a draft migration plan in [2]. >> Please review [2] if you haven't seen it and vote for this proposal. >> >> The vote will be open until 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> *IMPORTANT NOTE* >> I set a local protocol for this vote. >> There are 95 committers on this project [3] - the vote will be effective if >> it successfully gains more than 15% of voters (>= 15) from committers >> (including PMC members). This means, that although only PMC member votes are >> counted for the final result, the votes from all committers are important to >> make the vote result effective. >> >> If there are less than 15 votes at 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC, I will expand the >> term to 2022-06-13 16:00 UTC. If this fails to get sufficient voters after >> the expanded time limit, I'll cancel this vote regardless of the result. >> But why do I set such an extra bar? My fear is that if such things are >> decided by the opinions of a few members, the result shouldn't yield a good >> outcome for the future. It isn't my goal to just pass the vote [4]. >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557> >> [3] https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene >> <https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene> >> [4] I'm sorry for being overly cautious, but I have never met in person or >> virtually any of the committers (with a very few exceptions), therefore >> cannot assess if the vote result is reliable or not unless there is certain >> explicit feedback. >> >> Tomoko > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> > Virus-free. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link> > > <x-msg://22/#m_-2736906657232979281_m_-7706922548550600098_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
