+1 Approve (PMC) Thanks so much for doing all of the work for this Tomoko!
- Houston On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:38 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 Approve (PMC) > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tomoko Uchida < > tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> As we had previous discussion thread [1], I propose migration to GitHub >> issue from Jira. >> It'd be technically possible (see [2] for details) and I think it'd be >> good for the project - not only for welcoming new developers who are not >> familiar with Jira, but also for improving the experiences of long-term >> committers/contributors by consolidating the conversation platform. >> >> You can see a short summary of the discussion, some stats on current Jira >> issues, and a draft migration plan in [2]. >> Please review [2] if you haven't seen it and vote for this proposal. >> >> The vote will be open until 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> *IMPORTANT NOTE* >> I set a local protocol for this vote. >> There are 95 committers on this project [3] - the vote will be effective >> if it successfully gains more than 15% of voters (>= 15) from committers >> (including PMC members). This means, that although only PMC member votes >> are counted for the final result, the votes from all committers are >> important to make the vote result effective. >> >> If there are less than 15 votes at 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC, I will expand >> the term to 2022-06-13 16:00 UTC. If this fails to get sufficient voters >> after the expanded time limit, I'll cancel this vote regardless of the >> result. >> But why do I set such an extra bar? My fear is that if such things are >> decided by the opinions of a few members, the result shouldn't yield a good >> outcome for the future. It isn't my goal to just pass the vote [4]. >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557 >> [3] https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene >> [4] I'm sorry for being overly cautious, but I have never met in person >> or virtually any of the committers (with a very few exceptions), therefore >> cannot assess if the vote result is reliable or not unless there is certain >> explicit feedback. >> >> Tomoko >> >
