-1 On Tue, 31 May, 2022, 4:06 am Xi Chen, <zacharym...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 from me (committer, non-PMC) > > Thanks Tomoko for starting the discussion and organizing / leading this > effort! > > Best, > Zach > > On May 30, 2022, at 2:56 PM, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 Approve (PMC) > > Thanks so much for doing all of the work for this Tomoko! > > - Houston > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:38 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 Approve (PMC) >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> >> >> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tomoko Uchida < >> tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> As we had previous discussion thread [1], I propose migration to GitHub >>> issue from Jira. >>> It'd be technically possible (see [2] for details) and I think it'd be >>> good for the project - not only for welcoming new developers who are not >>> familiar with Jira, but also for improving the experiences of long-term >>> committers/contributors by consolidating the conversation platform. >>> >>> You can see a short summary of the discussion, some stats on current >>> Jira issues, and a draft migration plan in [2]. >>> Please review [2] if you haven't seen it and vote for this proposal. >>> >>> The vote will be open until 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC. >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> Here is my +1 >>> >>> *IMPORTANT NOTE* >>> I set a local protocol for this vote. >>> There are 95 committers on this project [3] - the vote will be effective >>> if it successfully gains more than 15% of voters (>= 15) from committers >>> (including PMC members). This means, that although only PMC member votes >>> are counted for the final result, the votes from all committers are >>> important to make the vote result effective. >>> >>> If there are less than 15 votes at 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC, I will expand >>> the term to 2022-06-13 16:00 UTC. If this fails to get sufficient voters >>> after the expanded time limit, I'll cancel this vote regardless of the >>> result. >>> But why do I set such an extra bar? My fear is that if such things are >>> decided by the opinions of a few members, the result shouldn't yield a good >>> outcome for the future. It isn't my goal to just pass the vote [4]. >>> >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557 >>> [3] https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene >>> [4] I'm sorry for being overly cautious, but I have never met in person >>> or virtually any of the committers (with a very few exceptions), therefore >>> cannot assess if the vote result is reliable or not unless there is certain >>> explicit feedback. >>> >>> Tomoko >>> >>
