On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Opinions?
I disagree - I think it makes it really easy to track who actually did the commit (the person *responsible* if it's a bad commit or a good commit) and I think there is some credit in a committer applying someones patch. They are doing the review and taking responsibility for the code change. I think *via* is pretty clear regarding credit, and I think it has value in it's information. Even if you simply commit someone else work, *you* are contributing to the issue. You better have reviewed it, you better be willing to take responsibility for it. Appears I'm in the strong minority though. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
