What do checksums look like? On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote:
> I commented out the deletion of the dir in the tearDown. Not sure if that > looks reasonable or not, but on the surface they look equivalent. > > Here's the contents of the dir on Ubuntu: > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000000 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000200 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000400 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000600 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1387722 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000800 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000000 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000210 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000420 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000630 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000840 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-0 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-200 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-400 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-600 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 136352 2011-12-28 21:17 U-800 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-0 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-1 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-2 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-3 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144372 2011-12-28 21:17 V-4 > > Here's what my Mac looks like: > total 20296 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000000 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000200 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000400 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000600 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.3M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000800 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000000 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000210 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000420 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000630 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000840 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-200 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-400 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-600 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 133K Dec 28 21:28 U-800 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-1 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 V-4 > > On Dec 28, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > Yeah.. but this is a difference from the correct answer. I am moderately > > sure that this is a problem writing to the temp directory. > > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > >> It's expecting the answer to be 0, but it's some really large value. > >> > testSingularValues(org.apache.mahout.math.ssvd.SequentialOutOfCoreSvdTest): > >> expected:<0.0> but was:<4131200.0000000037> > >> > >> > >> On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> > >>> I think that the answer is 0 because the model is not being read and we > >> are > >>> swallowing an exception somewhere. This is what an uninitialized > matrix > >>> would give as a result. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I can reproduce outside of Jenkins. It really seems odd that the > answer > >>>> is off by so much. > >>>> > >>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I vaguely remember Jenkins had problems with creating stuff in Java > tmp > >>>>> dir. E.g. I remember that was creating problems for Mr tasks in local > >> mr > >>>>> mode legitimately using boxed task temporary space. > >>>>> > >>>>> OK I'll try to scan for the problem tomorrow. > >>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 10:50 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> So I am like everybody else. The test works for me. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My suspicion is that there is something going on with the temporary > >>>>>> directory that I am trying to use and that the environment that > >> Jenkins > >>>> is > >>>>>> using is somehow strange. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The only slightly surprising idiom I am using is to create a > temporary > >>>>>> file, delete it and recreate it as a directory. I even check the > >> return > >>>>>> values from the delete and the mkdir. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I will keep looking. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning < > ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Indeed it does. Thanks for pointing that out. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This error is very strange. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov < > >> dlie...@gmail.com > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ted, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> do you have an idea why this test may be failing? I think this > test > >>>>>> comes > >>>>>>>> with M-792 commit. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I can take a look at it, I suspect something in the environment > can > >> be > >>>>>>>> tripping it. > >>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 8:54 PM, "Sean Owen" <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It's all errors in the Apache infrastructure, rather than a real > >> test > >>>>>>>>> failure. At least, stuff passes for me locally, and that's what's > >>>>>>>>> important. > >>>>>>>>> So I'm ignoring these. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jeff Eastman > >>>>>>>>> <jeast...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> I'm getting a lot of these emails yet all the tests run locally > >> for > >>>>>>>> me. > >>>>>>>>> Does > >>>>>>>>>> anybody have an idea what the problem is? This close to a > release > >> it > >>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>> be really nice to have Jenkins on our side. > >>>>>>>>>> Jeff > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------------- > >>>> Grant Ingersoll > >>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> -------------------------------------------- > >> Grant Ingersoll > >> http://www.lucidimagination.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > > -------------------------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > >
