U and V look suspect, degenerate (only 4 first columns are nonzero, the rest of matrices are zeros.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, fails for me on ubuntu without any special environment issues. > Which makes it easier, i can step thru. > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What do checksums look like? >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: >> >>> I commented out the deletion of the dir in the tearDown. Not sure if that >>> looks reasonable or not, but on the surface they look equivalent. >>> >>> Here's the contents of the dir on Ubuntu: >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000000 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000200 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000400 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000600 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1387722 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000800 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000000 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000210 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000420 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000630 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000840 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-0 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-200 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-400 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-600 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 136352 2011-12-28 21:17 U-800 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-0 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-1 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-2 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-3 >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144372 2011-12-28 21:17 V-4 >>> >>> Here's what my Mac looks like: >>> total 20296 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000000 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000200 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000400 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000600 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.3M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000800 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000000 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000210 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000420 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000630 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000840 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-0 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-200 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-400 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-600 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 133K Dec 28 21:28 U-800 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-0 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-1 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-2 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-3 >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 V-4 >>> >>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>> >>> > Yeah.. but this is a difference from the correct answer. I am moderately >>> > sure that this is a problem writing to the temp directory. >>> > >>> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> It's expecting the answer to be 0, but it's some really large value. >>> >> >>> testSingularValues(org.apache.mahout.math.ssvd.SequentialOutOfCoreSvdTest): >>> >> expected:<0.0> but was:<4131200.0000000037> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> I think that the answer is 0 because the model is not being read and we >>> >> are >>> >>> swallowing an exception somewhere. This is what an uninitialized >>> matrix >>> >>> would give as a result. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I can reproduce outside of Jenkins. It really seems odd that the >>> answer >>> >>>> is off by so much. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> I vaguely remember Jenkins had problems with creating stuff in Java >>> tmp >>> >>>>> dir. E.g. I remember that was creating problems for Mr tasks in local >>> >> mr >>> >>>>> mode legitimately using boxed task temporary space. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> OK I'll try to scan for the problem tomorrow. >>> >>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 10:50 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> So I am like everybody else. The test works for me. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> My suspicion is that there is something going on with the temporary >>> >>>>>> directory that I am trying to use and that the environment that >>> >> Jenkins >>> >>>> is >>> >>>>>> using is somehow strange. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> The only slightly surprising idiom I am using is to create a >>> temporary >>> >>>>>> file, delete it and recreate it as a directory. I even check the >>> >> return >>> >>>>>> values from the delete and the mkdir. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> I will keep looking. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning < >>> ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Indeed it does. Thanks for pointing that out. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> This error is very strange. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov < >>> >> dlie...@gmail.com >>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Ted, >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> do you have an idea why this test may be failing? I think this >>> test >>> >>>>>> comes >>> >>>>>>>> with M-792 commit. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> I can take a look at it, I suspect something in the environment >>> can >>> >> be >>> >>>>>>>> tripping it. >>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 8:54 PM, "Sean Owen" <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> It's all errors in the Apache infrastructure, rather than a real >>> >> test >>> >>>>>>>>> failure. At least, stuff passes for me locally, and that's what's >>> >>>>>>>>> important. >>> >>>>>>>>> So I'm ignoring these. >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jeff Eastman >>> >>>>>>>>> <jeast...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm getting a lot of these emails yet all the tests run locally >>> >> for >>> >>>>>>>> me. >>> >>>>>>>>> Does >>> >>>>>>>>>> anybody have an idea what the problem is? This close to a >>> release >>> >> it >>> >>>>>>>>> would >>> >>>>>>>>>> be really nice to have Jenkins on our side. >>> >>>>>>>>>> Jeff >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>>> Grant Ingersoll >>> >>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >> -------------------------------------------- >>> >> Grant Ingersoll >>> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> Grant Ingersoll >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >>> >>> >>>
