Yeah, fails for me on ubuntu without any special environment issues. Which makes it easier, i can step thru.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > What do checksums look like? > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: > >> I commented out the deletion of the dir in the tearDown. Not sure if that >> looks reasonable or not, but on the surface they look equivalent. >> >> Here's the contents of the dir on Ubuntu: >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000000 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000200 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000400 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000600 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1387722 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000800 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000000 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000210 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000420 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000630 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000840 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-0 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-200 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-400 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-600 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 136352 2011-12-28 21:17 U-800 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-0 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-1 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-2 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-3 >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144372 2011-12-28 21:17 V-4 >> >> Here's what my Mac looks like: >> total 20296 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000000 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000200 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000400 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000600 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.3M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000800 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000000 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000210 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000420 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000630 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000840 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-0 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-200 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-400 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-600 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 133K Dec 28 21:28 U-800 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-0 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-1 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-2 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-3 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 V-4 >> >> On Dec 28, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> > Yeah.. but this is a difference from the correct answer. I am moderately >> > sure that this is a problem writing to the temp directory. >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >> >wrote: >> > >> >> It's expecting the answer to be 0, but it's some really large value. >> >> >> testSingularValues(org.apache.mahout.math.ssvd.SequentialOutOfCoreSvdTest): >> >> expected:<0.0> but was:<4131200.0000000037> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> >> >>> I think that the answer is 0 because the model is not being read and we >> >> are >> >>> swallowing an exception somewhere. This is what an uninitialized >> matrix >> >>> would give as a result. >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> I can reproduce outside of Jenkins. It really seems odd that the >> answer >> >>>> is off by so much. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> I vaguely remember Jenkins had problems with creating stuff in Java >> tmp >> >>>>> dir. E.g. I remember that was creating problems for Mr tasks in local >> >> mr >> >>>>> mode legitimately using boxed task temporary space. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> OK I'll try to scan for the problem tomorrow. >> >>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 10:50 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> So I am like everybody else. The test works for me. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> My suspicion is that there is something going on with the temporary >> >>>>>> directory that I am trying to use and that the environment that >> >> Jenkins >> >>>> is >> >>>>>> using is somehow strange. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> The only slightly surprising idiom I am using is to create a >> temporary >> >>>>>> file, delete it and recreate it as a directory. I even check the >> >> return >> >>>>>> values from the delete and the mkdir. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I will keep looking. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning < >> ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Indeed it does. Thanks for pointing that out. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> This error is very strange. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov < >> >> dlie...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Ted, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> do you have an idea why this test may be failing? I think this >> test >> >>>>>> comes >> >>>>>>>> with M-792 commit. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I can take a look at it, I suspect something in the environment >> can >> >> be >> >>>>>>>> tripping it. >> >>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 8:54 PM, "Sean Owen" <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> It's all errors in the Apache infrastructure, rather than a real >> >> test >> >>>>>>>>> failure. At least, stuff passes for me locally, and that's what's >> >>>>>>>>> important. >> >>>>>>>>> So I'm ignoring these. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jeff Eastman >> >>>>>>>>> <jeast...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm getting a lot of these emails yet all the tests run locally >> >> for >> >>>>>>>> me. >> >>>>>>>>> Does >> >>>>>>>>>> anybody have an idea what the problem is? This close to a >> release >> >> it >> >>>>>>>>> would >> >>>>>>>>>> be really nice to have Jenkins on our side. >> >>>>>>>>>> Jeff >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -------------------------------------------- >> >>>> Grant Ingersoll >> >>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> >> Grant Ingersoll >> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> Grant Ingersoll >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> >>
