But it is not a problem reading U or V files, that's indeed what U and V contain.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: > U and V look suspect, degenerate (only 4 first columns are nonzero, > the rest of matrices are zeros. > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, fails for me on ubuntu without any special environment issues. >> Which makes it easier, i can step thru. >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> What do checksums look like? >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: >>> >>>> I commented out the deletion of the dir in the tearDown. Not sure if that >>>> looks reasonable or not, but on the surface they look equivalent. >>>> >>>> Here's the contents of the dir on Ubuntu: >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000000 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000200 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000400 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000600 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1387722 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000800 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000000 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000210 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000420 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000630 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000840 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-0 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-200 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-400 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-600 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 136352 2011-12-28 21:17 U-800 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-0 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-1 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-2 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-3 >>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144372 2011-12-28 21:17 V-4 >>>> >>>> Here's what my Mac looks like: >>>> total 20296 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000000 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000200 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000400 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000600 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.3M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000800 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000000 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000210 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000420 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000630 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000840 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-0 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-200 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-400 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-600 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 133K Dec 28 21:28 U-800 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-0 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-1 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-2 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-3 >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 V-4 >>>> >>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>> >>>> > Yeah.. but this is a difference from the correct answer. I am moderately >>>> > sure that this is a problem writing to the temp directory. >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >>>> >wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> It's expecting the answer to be 0, but it's some really large value. >>>> >> >>>> testSingularValues(org.apache.mahout.math.ssvd.SequentialOutOfCoreSvdTest): >>>> >> expected:<0.0> but was:<4131200.0000000037> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> I think that the answer is 0 because the model is not being read and we >>>> >> are >>>> >>> swallowing an exception somewhere. This is what an uninitialized >>>> matrix >>>> >>> would give as a result. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> I can reproduce outside of Jenkins. It really seems odd that the >>>> answer >>>> >>>> is off by so much. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I vaguely remember Jenkins had problems with creating stuff in Java >>>> tmp >>>> >>>>> dir. E.g. I remember that was creating problems for Mr tasks in local >>>> >> mr >>>> >>>>> mode legitimately using boxed task temporary space. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> OK I'll try to scan for the problem tomorrow. >>>> >>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 10:50 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> So I am like everybody else. The test works for me. >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> My suspicion is that there is something going on with the temporary >>>> >>>>>> directory that I am trying to use and that the environment that >>>> >> Jenkins >>>> >>>> is >>>> >>>>>> using is somehow strange. >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> The only slightly surprising idiom I am using is to create a >>>> temporary >>>> >>>>>> file, delete it and recreate it as a directory. I even check the >>>> >> return >>>> >>>>>> values from the delete and the mkdir. >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> I will keep looking. >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning < >>>> ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Indeed it does. Thanks for pointing that out. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> This error is very strange. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov < >>>> >> dlie...@gmail.com >>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> Ted, >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> do you have an idea why this test may be failing? I think this >>>> test >>>> >>>>>> comes >>>> >>>>>>>> with M-792 commit. >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> I can take a look at it, I suspect something in the environment >>>> can >>>> >> be >>>> >>>>>>>> tripping it. >>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 8:54 PM, "Sean Owen" <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> It's all errors in the Apache infrastructure, rather than a real >>>> >> test >>>> >>>>>>>>> failure. At least, stuff passes for me locally, and that's what's >>>> >>>>>>>>> important. >>>> >>>>>>>>> So I'm ignoring these. >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jeff Eastman >>>> >>>>>>>>> <jeast...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm getting a lot of these emails yet all the tests run locally >>>> >> for >>>> >>>>>>>> me. >>>> >>>>>>>>> Does >>>> >>>>>>>>>> anybody have an idea what the problem is? This close to a >>>> release >>>> >> it >>>> >>>>>>>>> would >>>> >>>>>>>>>> be really nice to have Jenkins on our side. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jeff >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Grant Ingersoll >>>> >>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >> -------------------------------------------- >>>> >> Grant Ingersoll >>>> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>> Grant Ingersoll >>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
