oh. it's because the synthetic input has only 4 singular values.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: > But it is not a problem reading U or V files, that's indeed what U and > V contain. > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> U and V look suspect, degenerate (only 4 first columns are nonzero, >> the rest of matrices are zeros. >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yeah, fails for me on ubuntu without any special environment issues. >>> Which makes it easier, i can step thru. >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> What do checksums look like? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll >>>> <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I commented out the deletion of the dir in the tearDown. Not sure if that >>>>> looks reasonable or not, but on the surface they look equivalent. >>>>> >>>>> Here's the contents of the dir on Ubuntu: >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000000 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000200 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000400 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1632612 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000600 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 1387722 2011-12-28 21:17 A-000000800 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000000 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000210 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000420 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000630 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144312 2011-12-28 21:17 B-000000840 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-0 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-200 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-400 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 160412 2011-12-28 21:17 U-600 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 136352 2011-12-28 21:17 U-800 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-0 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-1 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-2 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 168432 2011-12-28 21:17 V-3 >>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 XXXXXX XXXXXX 144372 2011-12-28 21:17 V-4 >>>>> >>>>> Here's what my Mac looks like: >>>>> total 20296 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000000 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000200 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000400 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.6M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000600 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 1.3M Dec 28 21:28 A-000000800 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000000 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000210 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000420 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000630 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 B-000000840 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-0 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-200 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-400 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 157K Dec 28 21:28 U-600 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 133K Dec 28 21:28 U-800 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-0 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-1 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-2 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 164K Dec 28 21:28 V-3 >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 XXXXXX staff 141K Dec 28 21:28 V-4 >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Yeah.. but this is a difference from the correct answer. I am >>>>> > moderately >>>>> > sure that this is a problem writing to the temp directory. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >>>>> >wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> It's expecting the answer to be 0, but it's some really large value. >>>>> >> >>>>> testSingularValues(org.apache.mahout.math.ssvd.SequentialOutOfCoreSvdTest): >>>>> >> expected:<0.0> but was:<4131200.0000000037> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> I think that the answer is 0 because the model is not being read and >>>>> >>> we >>>>> >> are >>>>> >>> swallowing an exception somewhere. This is what an uninitialized >>>>> matrix >>>>> >>> would give as a result. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >>>>> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> I can reproduce outside of Jenkins. It really seems odd that the >>>>> answer >>>>> >>>> is off by so much. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I vaguely remember Jenkins had problems with creating stuff in Java >>>>> tmp >>>>> >>>>> dir. E.g. I remember that was creating problems for Mr tasks in >>>>> >>>>> local >>>>> >> mr >>>>> >>>>> mode legitimately using boxed task temporary space. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK I'll try to scan for the problem tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 10:50 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> So I am like everybody else. The test works for me. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> My suspicion is that there is something going on with the temporary >>>>> >>>>>> directory that I am trying to use and that the environment that >>>>> >> Jenkins >>>>> >>>> is >>>>> >>>>>> using is somehow strange. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The only slightly surprising idiom I am using is to create a >>>>> temporary >>>>> >>>>>> file, delete it and recreate it as a directory. I even check the >>>>> >> return >>>>> >>>>>> values from the delete and the mkdir. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I will keep looking. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning < >>>>> ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed it does. Thanks for pointing that out. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> This error is very strange. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov < >>>>> >> dlie...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Ted, >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> do you have an idea why this test may be failing? I think this >>>>> test >>>>> >>>>>> comes >>>>> >>>>>>>> with M-792 commit. >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> I can take a look at it, I suspect something in the environment >>>>> can >>>>> >> be >>>>> >>>>>>>> tripping it. >>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 8:54 PM, "Sean Owen" <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's all errors in the Apache infrastructure, rather than a real >>>>> >> test >>>>> >>>>>>>>> failure. At least, stuff passes for me locally, and that's >>>>> >>>>>>>>> what's >>>>> >>>>>>>>> important. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I'm ignoring these. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jeff Eastman >>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jeast...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm getting a lot of these emails yet all the tests run locally >>>>> >> for >>>>> >>>>>>>> me. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> anybody have an idea what the problem is? This close to a >>>>> release >>>>> >> it >>>>> >>>>>>>>> would >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> be really nice to have Jenkins on our side. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jeff >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>> Grant Ingersoll >>>>> >>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -------------------------------------------- >>>>> >> Grant Ingersoll >>>>> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>> Grant Ingersoll >>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
