On 10/04/2010 03:08 PM, Simon Brouwer wrote:
 Hi Drew,

Op 4-10-2010 20:19, Drew Jensen schreef:
 On 10/04/2010 01:54 PM, Ian wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 19:45 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:

An important point indeed is that both side keep the constructive dialog open and trying to find compromises between their different objectives.
What are the different objectives of the two projects in your view
Martin?

Yes Please - I would be most interested in what you perceive the different objectives to be.

If I may add one more thing - this from one of the primary marketing pieces on the OO.o site:

-------------------
It's hard to believe that high quality,
easy to use software like OpenOffice.org 3 can really be free.

But thanks to contributions of time and money, from individuals and companies (large and small), OpenOffice.org is free for you to use today.

Furthermore, the open-source licence used by OpenOffice.org 3 means this freedom can never be taken away.

The OpenOffice.org community are delighted if you find our software of use.
-------------------------

During my time here Sun, then Oracle, was continually referred to as the primary sponsor of the community, not the community itself.

You seem to be implying that, in the above, Oracle are referring to themselves as the community itself? How so?

Sorry for the delay - in what may be a case of true irony, the business I have been threatening to launch for a while (BaseAnswers.com) landed it's first contract under the DBA name today , to build a custom job management system for a Canadian company, utilizing OpenOffice.org (the bid went out before all this went down) for document production and reporting. The confirmation came in as I was starting this email. (Once again proof that God has a sense of humor I think)

I am saying that Sun (now Oracle) went to lengths to create a distinction between the corporate entity and the community.

The excerpt I used, I believe, is but one example of this.

That over this last 10 years this distinction was manifest for example in the difference between StarOffice, a corporate product, and OpenOffice.org a community project and application.

Over the period which I have been personally observing events there has been numerous occasions when an individual would come to the mailing lists, or the forums, and start to ask about the Sun product OpenOffice.org. This has always been met with a swift response correcting this misconception.

During the period there was also a governance structure created for the OpenOffice.org community project. In this structure there where special arrangements made to insure that the major corporate sponsor would be always represented. From my perspective there was an attempt, and to put it in terms recently used on this list, for the corporate entity to have it's cake and eat it too.

That over the course of this period the members of the community governing structure not employed by the major corporate sponsor felt it necessary to create a non-profit foundation.

Certainly what one would call 'the community' included the major corporate sponsor.

What is happening now, IMO, is that Oracle is attempting to exercise a right of veto over the aspirations of the other members of the community.



If Oracle no longer feels that it's objectives are in alignment with those of the community at large, and therefore no longer willing to sponsor the OpenOffice.org Community, then I believe it best to make that statement publicly, clearly and without obfuscation.

Naturally the corporation is free to retain the registered domain name and trademark which are it's property. Although as one community member I would ask again for Oracle Corp to make those assets available to the OpenOffice.org Community.

In what way haven't those been available to the OpenOffice.org community?


I think I covered it above, if not please let me know.

Respectfully,

Drew

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@marketing.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@marketing.openoffice.org

Reply via email to