On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Davide Dozza <dav...@flossconsulting.it>wrote:
> Il 25/05/2011 16:55, Louis Suarez-Potts ha scritto: > > There are many good reasons to have any discussion as proposed by the > TDF—Florian and Sophie—on a neutral ground. I've mentioned the compelling > ones. > > > > And I also think we need to proceed very carefully here. Not only for > "community" reasons but also because a lot is at stake beyond our narrow > concerns. > > > > Time is come. As still member of OOo community I *strongly* believe that > such discussion should be made in public. > Otherwise we (the community) still fall into our "narrow concers" as it > was during last ten years. > > Community deserves at least a minimum of clarity on OOo future. > TDF is a possible place to reunify the community and there is nothing > else on the horizon. > > Davide > > > > I agree with Davide's point, transparency is really the best way to handle things. OOo is certainly not death and to a point we've seen more developers coming through in the project which have legitimate concerns about this community to keep working. -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@marketing.openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@marketing.openoffice.org with Subject: help
