All the issue have description, or am I wrong? Before upadting, it's good to hear if anyone has any questions about what needs to be done. I think it's relatively clear.
IMO, better use of your time would be pushing some code to help us to move forward. I believe this one is a strong candidate: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues/MARVIN-3?filter=allopenissues - Lucas On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi < daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Guys > > To help ourselves to avoid more misunderstanding I will update all the > issues we need to do to archive this big feature, everybody is ok with > this? > > Em sex, 9 de nov de 2018 às 00:25, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < > lucasbona...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > Alan, the issues that will help you implement the changes to support R > are > > created in our Jira > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:59 AM Alan Silva <ju...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Ok, guys > > > > > > I will like to get this and work with a start on this task this week > > based > > > today in your python-engine and I'll tell you about the progress. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi < > > > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 17:19, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < > > > > lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > > > > > > > > > This discussion is now duplicated at the thread with title "POCs, > > > > > Prototypes, experiments" > > > > > > > > > > Let's continue the discussion there. > > > > > > > > > > EOF > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:50 PM Daniel Takabayashi < > > > > > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/shajxIpLJHxxMbFgDXiPuhg/image?w=602&h=461&rev=1423&ac=1&parent=1ySERHGBXbHeyCMRookq5UfTuFkzzU0ugtjvR3rF3deY > > > > > > > > > > > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 11:20, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < > > > > > > lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Daniel, I can't open your attachment. It is broken for me. > > > Could > > > > > you > > > > > > > add a link to the image? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Lucas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM Daniel Takabayashi < > > > > > > > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png] > > > > > > > > attached the arch draw.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi < > > > > > > > > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> To try to give a little more details about this "new > concept" > > > that > > > > > we > > > > > > > >> want to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple > > > > architecture > > > > > > > draw. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox > > something > > > > > > > >> disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic. > > Also > > > in > > > > > > this > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > >> architecture we could use remote resource to process engines > > and > > > > > make > > > > > > > easy > > > > > > > >> the support for new languages. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user > > > must > > > > to > > > > > > > >> install and also we could start to support multiples O.S > (once > > > the > > > > > > REPL > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > >> a dummy application that only interprets and by pass > > commands). > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > >> Taka > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende < > > > > > > > luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >> escreveu: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello > > > > > > > >>> <rafa.reis.nove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > Alan, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help > us > > > > with > > > > > > some > > > > > > > >>> > problems > > > > > > > >>> > but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the > new > > > > > concept > > > > > > > >>> will be > > > > > > > >>> > the future > > > > > > > >>> > or not. Am I right? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus > on > > > the > > > > > > > >>> community. If the community agrees with the new direction, > > then > > > > > there > > > > > > > >>> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't > > agreement, > > > a > > > > > vote > > > > > > > >>> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > > > >>> Luciano Resende > > > > > > > >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > > > > >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
