Guys, anyone has question about what should be done? Push more code ???? Lol
Sent from my iPhone > On May 23, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <lucasb...@apache.org> > wrote: > > All the issue have description, or am I wrong? > > Before upadting, it's good to hear if anyone has any questions about what > needs to be done. I think it's relatively clear. > > IMO, better use of your time would be pushing some code to help us to move > forward. > I believe this one is a strong candidate: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues/MARVIN-3?filter=allopenissues > > - Lucas > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi < > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Guys >> >> To help ourselves to avoid more misunderstanding I will update all the >> issues we need to do to archive this big feature, everybody is ok with >> this? >> >> Em sex, 9 de nov de 2018 às 00:25, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < >> lucasbona...@gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> Alan, the issues that will help you implement the changes to support R >> are >>> created in our Jira >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:59 AM Alan Silva <ju...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok, guys >>>> >>>> I will like to get this and work with a start on this task this week >>> based >>>> today in your python-engine and I'll tell you about the progress. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi < >>>> daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 17:19, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < >>>>> lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> This discussion is now duplicated at the thread with title "POCs, >>>>>> Prototypes, experiments" >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's continue the discussion there. >>>>>> >>>>>> EOF >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:50 PM Daniel Takabayashi < >>>>>> daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/shajxIpLJHxxMbFgDXiPuhg/image?w=602&h=461&rev=1423&ac=1&parent=1ySERHGBXbHeyCMRookq5UfTuFkzzU0ugtjvR3rF3deY >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 11:20, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < >>>>>>> lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Daniel, I can't open your attachment. It is broken for me. >>>> Could >>>>>> you >>>>>>>> add a link to the image? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Lucas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM Daniel Takabayashi < >>>>>>>> daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png] >>>>>>>>> attached the arch draw.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi < >>>>>>>>> daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To try to give a little more details about this "new >> concept" >>>> that >>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> want to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple >>>>> architecture >>>>>>>> draw. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox >>> something >>>>>>>>>> disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic. >>> Also >>>> in >>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>> architecture we could use remote resource to process engines >>> and >>>>>> make >>>>>>>> easy >>>>>>>>>> the support for new languages. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user >>>> must >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> install and also we could start to support multiples O.S >> (once >>>> the >>>>>>> REPL >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> a dummy application that only interprets and by pass >>> commands). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Taka >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende < >>>>>>>> luckbr1...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello >>>>>>>>>>> <rafa.reis.nove...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help >> us >>>>> with >>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> problems >>>>>>>>>>>> but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the >> new >>>>>> concept >>>>>>>>>>> will be >>>>>>>>>>>> the future >>>>>>>>>>>> or not. Am I right? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus >> on >>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> community. If the community agrees with the new direction, >>> then >>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't >>> agreement, >>>> a >>>>>> vote >>>>>>>>>>> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Luciano Resende >>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >>>>>>>>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
