Brett Porter wrote:
I thought I should discuss a little further since Mark disagrees on some points here.
+1 The decision on which structure to use should be more dependent on
the "type" of group structure you have. If you expect the various
"subgroups" of your group to be releasing on separate schedules and/or
have new sub-groups created, then I would recommend you place the
artifacts into their own project directories. This way the various
groups can maintain separate directory structures with separate
contents, which will be easier to manage.
I couldn't parse this statement at all (no coffee :), so sorry if I'm on the wrong track with
what you said. I don't see what the release schedule has to do with the directory structure.
Releasing is pushing to a directory and you don't need to do anything there after that.
Perhaps it would be best if you could reply to anything you don't agree with on my other
email just sent as a starting point for a discussion.
I think I'm the one who didn't have enough coffee when I wrote this...
;-) I'll respond in kind to your other thread.
--
Mark R. Diggory
Software Developer
Harvard MIT Data Center
http://www.hmdc.harvard.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
