This has been discussed several times in the past. I must say, scope is
probably the best name I've seen for it so far.
It will get resolved in some way in the near future.
- Brett
Corey Scott wrote:
While we are on the subject of adding tags to <dependancy> has a scope
tag been considered? This would allow users to generate dep reports
and so on that lead to a better understanding of where and why the
dependancy exists.
Examples:
Runtime (default) <scope>runtime</scope>
Test Only <scope>test</scope>
Build Only <scope>build</scope>
Dependancy of a Dependancy <scope>??</scope>
I believe that this has been hinted at during previous discussions and
bug reports and i think it is has merit.
Comments?
-Corey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
