Mark, can you merge your changes into the trunk of maven-artifact?
I'm willing to try them out with 2.1.x.
If we can work in tandem there to validate and test that would be
great. Thanks for taking the time to test 2.0.x. I really, really
hope we can get this to work as it means that people using the
library independently, 2.1.x and 2.0.x will be using the same code
that that would be fantastic.
On 7 Sep 07, at 3:36 AM 7 Sep 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 04/09/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4 Sep 07, at 8:37 AM 4 Sep 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
I haven't had time to test it out in 2.1.x, although that FIXME
needs
fixing first as detailed in the issue. When are you thinking of
releasing maven-artifact? Could be worth trying to get 2.0.x to use
it first in case it requires any changes.
Yes, we should try it to see if it's even feasible. I have a little
Hudson grid I can flip it into to try it.
I started trying to get 2.0.x to use maven-artifact 3.0-SNAPSHOT. It
doesn't seem too bad - no compilation problems - currently just a
linking issue to resolve before the IT tests should hopefully pass.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
