That's all fine, I'm just saying that 2.0.10 has been out for a while now without any serious show stoppers that I'm aware of. 2.0.9 and 2.0.10 are very stable, I would rather see effort spent on the 2.2.x line instead.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Christian Gruber<[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to Nicholas' assessment. Too many firms I've worked with won't be > changing to 2.1/2.2 until it's been in production release for several > months, and probably won't trust it. They'll need critical bug support on > 2.0. We just need a window for migration, that's all. > > cheers, > Christian. > > On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:52 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > >> Brett Porter wrote: >> >> - remove the 2.1.1 version from JIRA and remove the 2.1.x SVN branch - >>> >> >> +1 >> >> - promote the 2.2.0 as the stable release on the site and push all bugfix >>> >>> work towards 2.2.x >>> >> >> +1 >> >> - a 2.0.11 release to get those sticking to 2.0.x the 37 fixes already >>> >>> committed there. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> - declare 2.0.x EOL after that release and delete the branch >>> >> >> non binding -1 : The 2.0 user base is still large, most of them just don't >> yet use the latest 2.0.10. We could just promote 2.2.x as the latest >> stable >> release BUT still consider a critical bug-fix branch for 2.0.x >> >> 2009/6/30 Paul Benedict <[email protected]> >> >>> Personally, I will not be upgrading to Maven 2.2 until the next patch >>> release. I am skipping 2.1 because there is no 2.1.1. Being >>> conservative in my approach, I find it just too risky inside an >>> organization to bring in upgrades without at least one patch release. >>> >>> Will anyone yet document justification for upgrading to 2.2/2.1 from >>> 2.0? JIRA notes are for the "geeks" but a general summary would be >>> worthwhile. >>> >>> I disagree with deleting branches. I think that's extreme. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Jason van Zyl<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 29-Jun-09, at 7:54 PM, Brian Fox wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah get rid of it. Is there really demand for the fixed in 2.0.11? I >>>>> feel like it's EOL now. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I would guess the vast majority of users are still using the 2.0.x line >>>> because the 2.1.x and 2.2.x lines have come out very quickly and users >>> >>> will >>>> >>>> probably let those bake awhile. I think there are still too many >>>> inconsistencies between the lines and change between minor versions >>> >>> happened >>>> >>>> a little too quickly for people to absorb. I think the 2.0.x line will >>> >>> still >>>> >>>> be in widespread use for the next year. >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Brett Porter<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Just a matter of clarity. If its not there, there will be no question >>>>>> about >>>>>> whether to merge to it or not. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Brett >>>>>> >>>>>> On 30/06/2009, at 4:12 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmm... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - declare 2.0.x EOL after that release and delete the branch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What harm is there in keeping it around? Even if you never return to >>>>>>> it, it doesn't cost you anything to keep it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Jason van Zyl >>>> Founder, Apache Maven >>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >>>> http://twitter.com/SonatypeNexus >>>> http://twitter.com/SonatypeM2E >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Three may keep a secret if two of them are dead. >>>> >>>> -- Benjamin Franklin >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> > > Christian Edward Gruber > [email protected] > http://www.geekinasuit.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
