I'm -0 on the 2.0.11 release. On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Brett Porter<[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01/07/2009, at 6:01 AM, Brian Fox wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Brett Porter<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/07/2009, at 1:47 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: >>> >>>> I'm also fine with this, just would like to avoid some "EOL" tag on 2.0 >>>> that >>>> may be considered as lack of support by some corporate users using (old) >>>> maven releases >>> >>> Sure, we can use a different name. All I meant EOL to mean here was that >>> we >>> don't plan to make any more releases (unless something is found to be >>> really, horribly, wrong). EOD (end of development) is probably more >>> appropriate. >>> >> >> Exactly, and IMO, we're at that point today with 2.0.10 > > Ok, but are you leaning towards a -0 or a -1 on a 2.0.11 release? > > I'm happy to burn the small amount of my time on it and clean up the release > process along the way (given the issues we had with 2.2.0). > > I'm not looking to add any more changes, just release the 37 already merged > in there so we have a proper end point. It should be a short cycle since > it's stuff already in 2.1.0+, but there were a couple of critical ones (eg, > POM plugin ordering regression) that are worth having IMO. > > Cheers, > Brett > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
