On 01/07/2009, at 1:47 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
I'm also fine with this, just would like to avoid some "EOL" tag on
2.0 that
may be considered as lack of support by some corporate users using
(old)
maven releases
Sure, we can use a different name. All I meant EOL to mean here was
that we don't plan to make any more releases (unless something is
found to be really, horribly, wrong). EOD (end of development) is
probably more appropriate.
It'd still be "supported" (in our case, I think that means accepting
bugreps against 2.0.x) for some time yet.
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
