On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote:
> uh, you've got doxia-module-*.jar in your /usr/share/maven-2/lib/ > directory? > but these are not in Maven core: only doxia-api and doxia-logging-api are > part > of Maven core [2] > Other Doxia artifacts are used in site plugin only, and should not be > shared > in core. > Your problem seems to be related: this "doxia-default" role has been added > in > doxia-sitetools component, which should not be in the classpath. > see DOXIA-147 [3] > > IMHO, with full Doxia in Maven core classloader, you'll have failures with > reporting plugins (if not strange issues like the one you had here) > Yes, I've removed the doxia modules and added the needed doxia-sink-api and doxia-logging-api. I think you meant to doxia-sink-api not doxia-api. The issue is resolved! Thanks, --Kasun > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [2] http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/apache-maven/dependencies.html > > [3] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-147 > > Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011, Kasun Gajasinghe a écrit : > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> > wrote: > > > > Yes, 3.0.3 looks cleaner. Well, I answered the points for choosing > > > > 2.2.1. We surely need to support 3.0.3 too, the future of maven. > > > > Is it possible Doxia plays a part here too? We haven't really > bothered > > > > about these site stuff, and therefore, doxia version we have is a > > > > little older. > > > > > > no, Doxia shouldn't be involved in your actual problems: it's used only > > > for reporting, and there is only a simple doxia API that is included in > > > Maven core > > > > Yes, but the said issue is more related to the remote-resources-plugin. > It > > too only use doxia-sink-api though. Anyway, there's some bond between > that > > plugin and doxia. In [1] line 1348, the failed component's role-hint is > > "doxia-default". > > > > And, the nightmare I referred is not doxia, but the whole process. There > > were around 50 ebuilds that I've bumped in the process, and there were > lot > > of understanding to do in Maven as well. And, we just started the testing > > phase, so it's not suitable to put in to main tree in Gentoo. > > > > [1] http://paste.pocoo.org/show/426899/ > > > > There's another little issue with hidden classes in the uber jar. It > suits > > for a new thread i guess. > > > > --Kasun > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- ~~~*******'''''''''''''*******~~~ Kasun Gajasinghe, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. Blog: http://blog.kasunbg.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/kasunbg
