"No-one is using cvs anymore."
That's a wrong assumption, sad but true.
I still know companies which haven't invested in moving forward to a new
versioning system, because CVS still works good enough.
Investments is not only about the hardware and the investigation,
preparation and execution of the migration of repositories, but also about
the education of the users, for several reasons.
-Robert
Op Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:19:31 +0200 schreef Kristian Rosenvold
<kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com>:
The hosting bit is defined in context of apache, there is not much we
need to do in that respect. This dusussion has been on/off for quite a
few years, so I'm not entirely surprised if you haven't seen it all.
As for "fad", I'm old enough to believe that version control systems
have their "epochs". No-one is using cvs anymore. This seems to be the
decade of git; I'm sure something new & shiney will pop up in a few
years time.
Kristian
2012/9/5 Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>:
-1 Non binding.
I have no desire to setup and learn new tools for no clearly apparent
advantages.
There appears to be multitude of ways that DSCM's can be configured. I'm
not sure if sufficient thought/discussion has been given to the way in
which it should/can be set up.
Where it is to be hosted?
My view: Move got a good reason. A fad is not a good reason.
-Chris
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1. Have no spare time ATM, so cannot volunteer even if I would love to
On 5 September 2012 12:04, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote is to decide moving our source tree currently located in
one
> svn repository to git (multiple git repositories).
> First, we need to have at least 3 volunteers to help on Apache infra
> for this move and more generally on git Apache infrastructure. (if
you
> are volunteer you must say that with your vote).
> The vote will pass on majority (PMC committer) and if we have the
> minimum of 3 volunteers !
> BTW contributors can express their opinion by a vote too !
> The vote will decide on moving all the source tree (volunteers time
> will the main throttle).
>
> Volunteers will decide on what they move (notification on dev@ is
> mandatory).
> The goal is to move simple projects first(scm,surefire, indexer,core,
> wagon etc..) then plugins (except if Kristian want to start with
> plugins immediately :-) )
>
> Vote open for 72H.
>
> [+1] Move to git scm
> [0] No interest
> [-1] don't move to git (please explain why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
