+1 (non-binding) But I don't have the hard-core git knowledge to help out in the move. Would probably do more harm than good. :-)
/Anders On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > The hosting bit is defined in context of apache, there is not much we > need to do in that respect. This dusussion has been on/off for quite a > few years, so I'm not entirely surprised if you haven't seen it all. > > As for "fad", I'm old enough to believe that version control systems > have their "epochs". No-one is using cvs anymore. This seems to be the > decade of git; I'm sure something new & shiney will pop up in a few > years time. > > > Kristian > > > 2012/9/5 Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>: >> -1 Non binding. >> >> I have no desire to setup and learn new tools for no clearly apparent >> advantages. >> There appears to be multitude of ways that DSCM's can be configured. I'm >> not sure if sufficient thought/discussion has been given to the way in >> which it should/can be set up. >> Where it is to be hosted? >> >> My view: Move got a good reason. A fad is not a good reason. >> >> -Chris >> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Stephen Connolly < >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1. Have no spare time ATM, so cannot volunteer even if I would love to >>> >>> On 5 September 2012 12:04, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > This vote is to decide moving our source tree currently located in one >>> > svn repository to git (multiple git repositories). >>> > First, we need to have at least 3 volunteers to help on Apache infra >>> > for this move and more generally on git Apache infrastructure. (if you >>> > are volunteer you must say that with your vote). >>> > The vote will pass on majority (PMC committer) and if we have the >>> > minimum of 3 volunteers ! >>> > BTW contributors can express their opinion by a vote too ! >>> > The vote will decide on moving all the source tree (volunteers time >>> > will the main throttle). >>> > >>> > Volunteers will decide on what they move (notification on dev@ is >>> > mandatory). >>> > The goal is to move simple projects first(scm,surefire, indexer,core, >>> > wagon etc..) then plugins (except if Kristian want to start with >>> > plugins immediately :-) ) >>> > >>> > Vote open for 72H. >>> > >>> > [+1] Move to git scm >>> > [0] No interest >>> > [-1] don't move to git (please explain why) >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -- >>> > Olivier Lamy >>> > Talend: http://coders.talend.com >>> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> > >>> > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
