And windows which has a support near to the Amiga ;) --------- Arnaud
Le 8 déc. 2012 à 12:55, Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no> a écrit : > Disable color by default in batch mode then. I suppose we could detect > is users are running AmigaOS or aix and disable by default there too. > > Kristian > > Den 8. des. 2012 kl. 12:34 skrev Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>: > >> AIX still does not do well with ANSI style colour. >> >> And I wonder how Jenkins would cope parsing the output. >> >> Seriously 2013 soon or not, don't break the output and introduce crap into >> the output stream. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 08/12/2012, at 10:14 PM, Kristian Rosenvold >> <kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no> wrote: >> >>> Seriously this sounds like something you'd want to configure i. >>> MAVEN_OPTS, so I'd be inclined to do color by default in 2012, soon >>> 2013. >>> >>> K >>> >>> Den 8. des. 2012 kl. 11:14 skrev Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Which is what I thought. >>>> >>>> +1 to off by default then. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 08/12/2012, at 9:11 PM, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code >>>>> >>>>> It adds some extras character that you'll see if the console doesn't >>>>> support it >>>>> >>>>> --------- >>>>> Arnaud >>>>> >>>>> Le 8 déc. 2012 à 11:03, Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to know how it is implemented and what happens when it is run on >>>>> a >>>>> terminal that does not support it. >>>>> >>>>> -Chris >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 08/12/2012, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly >>>>> <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 from me >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> jesse mcconnell >>>>> >>>>> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < >>>>> >>>>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to >>>>> >>>>> core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very >>>>> >>>>> strong preference. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing >>>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 >>>>> >>>>> to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes >>>>> >>>>> make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users >>>>> >>>>> will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My €0.02 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Stephen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while >>>>> >>>>> for >>>>> >>>>> the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference. >>>>> >>>>> I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to >>>>> >>>>> use >>>>> >>>>> this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and >>>>> >>>>> control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting, >>>>> >>>>> even >>>>> >>>>> if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as >>>>> >>>>> it >>>>> >>>>> works. >>>>> >>>>> Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but >>>>> >>>>> that's a small group. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Robert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl < >>>>> >>>>> ja...@tesla.io >>>>> >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to >>>>> >>>>> include >>>>> >>>>> the colored logger as well. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> or >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point >>>>> >>>>> so >>>>> >>>>> what's the rush? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require >>>>> >>>>> extra >>>>> >>>>> adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to >>>>> >>>>> work out of the box, but we have to be sure.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Robert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies < >>>>> >>>>> bimargul...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and >>>>> >>>>> I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd >>>>> >>>>> be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the >>>>> >>>>> release 'as is'. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> good idea, Benson. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is >>>>> >>>>> not >>>>> >>>>> because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of >>>>> >>>>> comments >>>>> >>>>> in the thread. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a >>>>> >>>>> new >>>>> >>>>> plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem >>>>> >>>>> with >>>>> >>>>> that? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward >>>>> >>>>> compatibility? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and >>>>> >>>>> it >>>>> >>>>> worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> To: Maven Developers List < >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
