I'd like to know how it is implemented and what happens when it is run on a terminal that does not support it.
-Chris Sent from my iPhone On 08/12/2012, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from me > > On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote: > >> I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :) >> >> -- >> jesse mcconnell >> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to >>> core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very >>> strong preference. >>> >>> I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing >> 3.1.0 >>> to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes >>> make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them. >>> >>> The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users >>> will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top >>> >>> My €0.02 >>> >>> - Stephen >>> >>> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: >>> >>>> It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while >> for >>>> the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference. >>>> I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to >> use >>>> this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and >>>> control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting, >>> even >>>> if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as >> it >>>> works. >>>> Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but >>>> that's a small group. >>>> >>>> Robert >>>> >>>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl < >> ja...@tesla.io >>>> : >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to >> include >>>> the colored logger as well. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion >>>> >>>> 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default >>>> >>>> Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point >>> so >>>> what's the rush? >>>> >>>> That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require >> extra >>>> adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to >>>> work out of the box, but we have to be sure.) >>>> >>>> >>>> Robert >>>> >>>> >>>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies < >>>> bimargul...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and >>>> I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd >>>> be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the >>>> release 'as is'. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> good idea, Benson. >>>> >>>> Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is >> not >>>> because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of >> comments >>>> in the thread. >>>> >>>> 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a >>> new >>>> plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem >>> with >>>> that? >>>> >>>> Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward >>>> compatibility? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and >> it >>>> worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>> From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>>> To: Maven Developers List < --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
