Well, then at least a property to be set in ~/.m2/settings.xml to switch colors on would be nice :-). I for one would be much more interested in introducing a switch which allows to suppress INFO but not WARN :-).
Regards Mirko On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from me > > On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote: > >> I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :) >> >> -- >> jesse mcconnell >> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to >> > core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very >> > strong preference. >> > >> > I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing >> 3.1.0 >> > to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes >> > make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them. >> > >> > The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users >> > will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top >> > >> > My €0.02 >> > >> > - Stephen >> > >> > On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: >> > >> > > It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while >> for >> > > the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference. >> > > I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to >> use >> > > this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and >> > > control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting, >> > even >> > > if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as >> it >> > > works. >> > > Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but >> > > that's a small group. >> > > >> > > Robert >> > > >> > > Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl < >> ja...@tesla.io >> > >: >> > > >> > > >> > > On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to >> include >> > > the colored logger as well. >> > > >> > > >> > > I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion >> > > >> > > 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution >> > > >> > > or >> > > >> > > 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default >> > > >> > > Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point >> > so >> > > what's the rush? >> > > >> > > That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require >> extra >> > > adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to >> > > work out of the box, but we have to be sure.) >> > > >> > > >> > > Robert >> > > >> > > >> > > Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies < >> > > bimargul...@gmail.com>: >> > > >> > > As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and >> > > I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd >> > > be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the >> > > release 'as is'. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > good idea, Benson. >> > > >> > > Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is >> not >> > > because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of >> comments >> > > in the thread. >> > > >> > > 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a >> > new >> > > plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem >> > with >> > > that? >> > > >> > > Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward >> > > compatibility? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and >> it >> > > worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > LieGrue, >> > > strub >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > >> > > From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >> > > To: Maven Developers List < --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
