AIX still does not do well with ANSI style colour. And I wonder how Jenkins would cope parsing the output.
Seriously 2013 soon or not, don't break the output and introduce crap into the output stream. Sent from my iPhone On 08/12/2012, at 10:14 PM, Kristian Rosenvold <[email protected]> wrote: > Seriously this sounds like something you'd want to configure i. > MAVEN_OPTS, so I'd be inclined to do color by default in 2012, soon > 2013. > > K > > Den 8. des. 2012 kl. 11:14 skrev Chris Graham <[email protected]>: > >> Which is what I thought. >> >> +1 to off by default then. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 08/12/2012, at 9:11 PM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code >>> >>> It adds some extras character that you'll see if the console doesn't >>> support it >>> >>> --------- >>> Arnaud >>> >>> Le 8 déc. 2012 à 11:03, Chris Graham <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>> I'd like to know how it is implemented and what happens when it is run on a >>> terminal that does not support it. >>> >>> -Chris >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 08/12/2012, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Connolly >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 from me >>> >>> >>> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote: >>> >>> >>> I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> jesse mcconnell >>> >>> [email protected] <javascript:;> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < >>> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to >>> >>> core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very >>> >>> strong preference. >>> >>> >>> I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing >>> >>> 3.1.0 >>> >>> to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes >>> >>> make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them. >>> >>> >>> The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users >>> >>> will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top >>> >>> >>> My €0.02 >>> >>> >>> - Stephen >>> >>> >>> On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: >>> >>> >>> It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while >>> >>> for >>> >>> the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference. >>> >>> I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to >>> >>> use >>> >>> this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and >>> >>> control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting, >>> >>> even >>> >>> if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as >>> >>> it >>> >>> works. >>> >>> Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but >>> >>> that's a small group. >>> >>> >>> Robert >>> >>> >>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl < >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> : >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to >>> >>> include >>> >>> the colored logger as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion >>> >>> >>> 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution >>> >>> >>> or >>> >>> >>> 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default >>> >>> >>> Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point >>> >>> so >>> >>> what's the rush? >>> >>> >>> That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require >>> >>> extra >>> >>> adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to >>> >>> work out of the box, but we have to be sure.) >>> >>> >>> >>> Robert >>> >>> >>> >>> Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies < >>> >>> [email protected]>: >>> >>> >>> As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and >>> >>> I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd >>> >>> be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the >>> >>> release 'as is'. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> good idea, Benson. >>> >>> >>> Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is >>> >>> not >>> >>> because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of >>> >>> comments >>> >>> in the thread. >>> >>> >>> 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a >>> >>> new >>> >>> plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem >>> >>> with >>> >>> that? >>> >>> >>> Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward >>> >>> compatibility? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and >>> >>> it >>> >>> worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> >>> From: Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >>> >>> To: Maven Developers List < >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
