If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK for UTC+8.
+1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places? On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to > better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean > something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week, > then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast > that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still include > Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at > least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present. > Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly > meetings have a chance. > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on the > calendar! > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 for weekly > > > > Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by > step > > > > > > On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > > > >> +1 for bi-weekly. > >> > >> Regards! > >> > >> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Jojy Varghese <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > >> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > >> > >> > >> > >> +1 bi-weekly > >> > >> > >> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > >>> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>> > >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <[email protected]> > >>> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 for bi-weekly. > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > >>>> > >>> <[email protected] > >> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 Weekly > >>>>> > >>>>> -Elizabeth > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to > >>>>>> > >>>>> see > >>>> > >>>>> how people are liking it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <[email protected] > >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Guangya > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> always > >>>> > >>>>> reset > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> to biweekly. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <[email protected] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <[email protected] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>> > >>>>> bi-weekly > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> community > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> sync > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> today. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> missing > >>>> > >>>>> a > >>>>> > >>>>>> meeting > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> won't > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>> > >>>>> these > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> people's > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> commitments. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>> > >>>>>> might > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> have! > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* > >>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > >> > >> > > -- > > Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer > > Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG > > +86-10-8245 4084 | [email protected] | http://www.cguru.net > > > > > -- Best Regards, Haosdent Huang
