Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week, then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still include Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present. Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly meetings have a chance.
+1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on the calendar! On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for weekly > > Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by step > > > On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > >> +1 for bi-weekly. >> >> Regards! >> >> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） >> >> >> >> From: Jojy Varghese <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 >> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval >> >> >> >> +1 bi-weekly >> >> >> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 for bi-weekly >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 for bi-weekly. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg >>>> >>> <[email protected] >> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 Weekly >>>>> >>>>> -Elizabeth >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to >>>>>> >>>>> see >>>> >>>>> how people are liking it. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <[email protected] >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Guangya >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < >>>>>>> >>>>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> always >>>> >>>>> reset >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to biweekly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <[email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>> >>>>> bi-weekly >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> community >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sync >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> today. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> missing >>>> >>>>> a >>>>> >>>>>> meeting >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>> >>>>> these >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> commitments. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>> >>>>>> might >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> have! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* >>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> > -- > Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer > Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG > +86-10-8245 4084 | [email protected] | http://www.cguru.net > >
