+1 bi-weekly On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Rojas <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times) > > > On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly > > (once every 2 weeks). > > > > There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync > > today. > > > > An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting > won't > > be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > > > > An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these > > meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time > > commitments. > > > > This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have! > > > > Thanks, > > > > MPark. > >
