+1 weekly
On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" <ma...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for
bi-weekly.
Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive thing
about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who
"like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!)
Thanks!
--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo wrote:
> +1 for weekly.
>
> Best Regards,
> Diana Arroyo
> darr...@us.ibm.com
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13
> AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > xiao
> ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36
> GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
>
> From: tommy xiao
> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> +1 for bi-weekly.
>
> 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
>
> > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first
> > place, as I suspect many others as well.
> >
> > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and
> 5pm
> > or something like that.)
> >
> > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent wrote:
> > >
> > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific)
> OK
> > > for UTC+8.
> > >
> > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times
> to
> > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
> > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a
> > week,
> > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west
> coast
> > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still
> > include
> > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at
> > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present.
> > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly
> > >> meetings have a chance.
> > >>
> > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on
> > the
> > >> calendar!
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 for weekly
> > >>>
> > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by
> > >> step
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> From: Jojy Varghese
> > >>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> > >>>> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01
> > >>>> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 bi-weekly
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <
> a...@mesosphere.com
> > >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> > > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 Weekly
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -Elizabeth
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a
> bit
> > to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> see
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> how people are liking it.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <
> gyliu...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Guangya
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> always
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> reset
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> to biweekly.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <
> > ka...@mesosphere.io
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <
> > j...@mesosphere.io
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io >
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> haosd...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mcyp...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> bi-weekly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> sync
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> today.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> meeting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> won't
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> these
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> time
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> might
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> have!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer
> > >>> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG
> > >>> +86-10-8245 4084 | mad...@cn.ibm.com | http://www.cguru.net
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Haosdent Huang
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Deshi Xiao
> Twitter: xds2000
> E-mail: xiaods(AT)gmail.com
>
>
>
>
