Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for bi-weekly.
Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive thing about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!) Thanks! -- *Marco Massenzio* Distributed Systems Engineer http://codetrips.com On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo <darr...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 for weekly. > > Best Regards, > Diana Arroyo > darr...@us.ibm.com > > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske <b]tommy > xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske <be...@mesosphere.io>: > > From: tommy xiao <xia...@gmail.com> > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > ------------------------------ > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske <be...@mesosphere.io>: > > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first > > place, as I suspect many others as well. > > > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and > 5pm > > or something like that.) > > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) > OK > > > for UTC+8. > > > > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places? > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times > to > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a > > week, > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west > coast > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still > > include > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present. > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly > > >> meetings have a chance. > > >> > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on > > the > > >> calendar! > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 for weekly > > >>> > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by > > >> step > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards! > > >>>> > > >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> From: Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io> > > >>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > >>>> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > > >>>> Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 bi-weekly > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > > >>>>> > > >>>> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov < > a...@mesosphere.com > > > > > >>>>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io > > >>>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 Weekly > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -Elizabeth > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> > > wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a > bit > > to > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> see > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> how people are liking it. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu < > gyliu...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Guangya > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> always > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> reset > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> to biweekly. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya < > > ka...@mesosphere.io > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht < > > j...@mesosphere.io > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> haosd...@gmail.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> bi-weekly > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> community > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> sync > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> today. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> meeting > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> won't > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> these > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> time > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> might > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> have! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer > > >>> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG > > >>> +86-10-8245 4084 | mad...@cn.ibm.com | http://www.cguru.net > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > Haosdent Huang > > > > > > > -- > Deshi Xiao > Twitter: xds2000 > E-mail: xiaods(AT)gmail.com > > > >
