+1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times)
> On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
> (once every 2 weeks).
>
> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
> today.
>
> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't
> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
>
> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
> commitments.
>
> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have!
>
> Thanks,
>
> MPark.
