The result of this poll was: Bi-weekly: 12 Weekly: 10
So while pretty even, bi-weekly wins the vote. Let's proceed with bi-weekly community syncs and we can always reevaluate going forward. Thanks, MPark. On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:51 PM zhiwei <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 bi-weekly > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Rojas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times) > > > > > On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly > > > (once every 2 weeks). > > > > > > There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync > > > today. > > > > > > An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting > > won't > > > be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > > > > > > An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these > > > meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time > > > commitments. > > > > > > This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might > have! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > MPark. > > > > >
