+1 Regards, Sangjin On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0 > release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId. > > Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is the > reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home > here. > > > Regards, > Alan > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId > > with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition > > (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think about > > moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine with > > releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite (i.e. > > client + server) with the version number 2 after then. > > > > > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > > > Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home. > > > Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the > > > new > > > stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's > > > built > > > on MINA 2.0 goodness. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Alan > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > > > > > Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? Or > > > > you > > > > want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion? > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > Yep, that's it. > > > > > > > > > > The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under > > > > > 1.0 of > > > > > it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId > > > > > of > > > > > the new > > > > > client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and > > > > > written > > > > > from > > > > > "scratch" off of MINA 2.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think it's this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We > > > > > > discussed > > > > > > making it a branch of asyncweb. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Sangjin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Where do I look in the headers? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) < > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can > > > > > > > re-read the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > related thread? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The discussion that took place earlier was that this would > > > > > > > > be our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v1.0 > > > > > > > > > release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I > > > > > > > > > think it > > > > > > > > > still > > > > > > > > > needs to be put to a vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the > > > > > > > > > best way > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rick McGuire wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox > > > > > > > > > > appear > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > settled down, so I think now would be a good time to > > > > > > > > > > > move it > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > the Mina > > > > > > > > > > > project if everybody agrees. Where would be the > > > > > > > > > > > appropriate > > > > > > > > > > > place > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > put this client? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red > > > > > > > > > > Hat > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > > -- > > what we call human nature is actually human habit > > -- > > http://gleamynode.net/ > > > > >
