I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen - The svn path under which the code will be moved is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently the branches directory is empty). - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will be renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to org.apache.asyncweb.client.*. - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb - artifactId: asyncweb-client - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT - name: AsyncHttpClient
Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think... Thanks, Sangjin On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please go ahead and move it here. :) > > Cheers, > > Sangjin Lee wrote: > > +1 > > Regards, > > Sangjin > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0 > >> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId. > >> > >> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is > the > >> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home > >> here. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alan > >> > >> > >> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > >> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId > >>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition > >>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think > about > >>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine > with > >>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite > (i.e. > >>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then. > >>> > >>> > >>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>> > >>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home. > >>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the > >>>> new > >>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's > >>>> built > >>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Alan > >>>> > >>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? > Or > >>>>> you > >>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion? > >>>>> > >>>>> Alex > >>>>> > >>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>>> > >>>>> Yep, that's it. > >>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under > >>>>>> 1.0 of > >>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId > >>>>>> of > >>>>>> the new > >>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and > >>>>>> written > >>>>>> from > >>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Alan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think it's this: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We > >>>>>>> discussed > >>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Sangjin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < > >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>> Alan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) < > >>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can > >>>>>>>> re-read the > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> related thread? > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would > >>>>>>>>> be our > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> v1.0 > >>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I > >>>>>>>>>> think it > >>>>>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>> Alan > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) > >>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the > >>>>>>>>>> best way > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT? > >>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox > >>>>>>>>>>> appear > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to > >>>>>>>>>>>> move it > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina > >>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the > >>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate > >>>>>>>>>>>> place > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> put this client? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rick > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red > >>>>>>>>>>> Hat > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> -- > >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > >>> -- > >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit > >>> -- > >>> http://gleamynode.net/ > >>> > >>> > > -- > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > >
