+1! ;-)
Sangjin Lee wrote: > I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen > - The svn path under which the code will be moved is > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently > the branches directory is empty). > - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will be > renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to > org.apache.asyncweb.client.*. > - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb > - artifactId: asyncweb-client > - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT > - name: AsyncHttpClient > > Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think... > > Thanks, > Sangjin > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Please go ahead and move it here. :) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Sangjin Lee wrote: >>> +1 >>> Regards, >>> Sangjin >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0 >>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId. >>>> >>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is >> the >>>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home >>>> here. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId >>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition >>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think >> about >>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine >> with >>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite >> (i.e. >>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home. >>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the >>>>>> new >>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's >>>>>> built >>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Alan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? >> Or >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep, that's it. >>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under >>>>>>>> 1.0 of >>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> the new >>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and >>>>>>>> written >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think it's this: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We >>>>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Sangjin >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < >>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) < >>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can >>>>>>>>>> re-read the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> related thread? >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would >>>>>>>>>>> be our >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0 >>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I >>>>>>>>>>>> think it >>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) >>>>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the >>>>>>>>>>>> best way >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox >>>>>>>>>>>>> appear >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina >>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>>>> -- >>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>> -- >>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>> >>>>> >> -- >> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >> -- >> what we call human nature is actually human habit >> -- >> http://gleamynode.net/ >> >>
