Please go ahead and move it here. :) Cheers,
Sangjin Lee wrote: > +1 > Regards, > Sangjin > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0 >> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId. >> >> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is the >> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home >> here. >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> >> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId >>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition >>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think about >>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine with >>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite (i.e. >>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then. >>> >>> >>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>> >>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home. >>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the >>>> new >>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's >>>> built >>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alan >>>> >>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>>> >>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? Or >>>>> you >>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion? >>>>> >>>>> Alex >>>>> >>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> >>>>> Yep, that's it. >>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under >>>>>> 1.0 of >>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId >>>>>> of >>>>>> the new >>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and >>>>>> written >>>>>> from >>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Alan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it's this: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We >>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Sangjin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) < >>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can >>>>>>>> re-read the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> related thread? >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would >>>>>>>>> be our >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> v1.0 >>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I >>>>>>>>>> think it >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) >>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the >>>>>>>>>> best way >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox >>>>>>>>>>> appear >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to >>>>>>>>>>>> move it >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina >>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the >>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate >>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> put this client? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rick >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red >>>>>>>>>>> Hat >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> -- >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>> -- >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>> -- >>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>> >>> -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
