One tiny issue: 1.0-SNAPSHOT should be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT according to our version numbering scheme:
http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html#Downloads-VersionNumberingScheme Sangjin Lee wrote: > The move is done... > Thanks, > Sangjin > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Sangjin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen >> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently >> the branches directory is empty). >> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will be >> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to >> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*. >> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb >> - artifactId: asyncweb-client >> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT >> - name: AsyncHttpClient >> >> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think... >> >> Thanks, >> Sangjin >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> Please go ahead and move it here. :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Sangjin Lee wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> Regards, >>>> Sangjin >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no >>> 1.0 >>>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId. >>>>> >>>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and >>> is the >>>>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice >>> home >>>>> here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Alan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId >>>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition >>>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think >>> about >>>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine >>> with >>>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite >>> (i.e. >>>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home. >>>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when >>> the >>>>>>> new >>>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's >>>>>>> built >>>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? >>> Or >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yep, that's it. >>>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under >>>>>>>>> 1.0 of >>>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> the new >>>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and >>>>>>>>> written >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think it's this: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We >>>>>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Sangjin >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < >>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) < >>>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can >>>>>>>>>>> re-read the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> related thread? >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would >>>>>>>>>>>> be our >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it >>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the >>>>>>>>>>>>> best way >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>>>>> -- >>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>>>>> -- >>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> -- >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>> -- >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>> -- >>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>> >>> -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
