On 16 July 2013 08:41, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 7/16/13 1:14 AM, sebb a écrit :
>> Have you seen this?
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>>
>> It suggests that additions to NOTICE should be quite rare.
>
> The NOTICE files just contain the Apache License reference as of today.
> The one used for binary contains a ref rto SLF4J and Protobuf, which are
> distributed with the bin. I think this corretly fits with the requirements.

I'm not sure that entries in NOTICE are required.
If not required, it must not be added.

> The very same for the LICENSE files.

Yes, LICENSE does need entries (or pointers to other files) for all
included bits.

>>
>> It is important that the N&L files relate to the bits which are
>> actually included.
>>
>> This means that the N&L files at the top level of SVN can be used
>> directly for the source archive, as the archive and SVN should
>> generally agree (bar maybe the DOAP).
>>
>> The binary archive may need additional License (and occasionally)
>> Notice entries, depending what is additionally bundled.
> Yes. It has been corrected yesterday, and I just pushed the modifications.
>
>
>
> Btw, I really think that the
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html is far from being easy to
> understand for not native english speakers, especially by those who have
> not a degree in law school...

What is not clear? Please raise that with Infra.

> There are a few use cases that would
> benefit the whole community if they were included in this page, like :
> - junit, what to do regarding N&L files ?
> - slf4j/log4j, what to do regarding N&L files?

In that case, please ask on legal discuss / infra.

> - transitive dependencies like cal10n-api.jar (inlcuded by slf4j), what
> to do regarding N&L files ? (note that it could be a dependency of
> another jar than slf4j, I just picked this one because I know that slf4j
> depends on this jar).

Transitive dependencies are no different from other dependencies - are
the bits actually included?

>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>

Reply via email to