-1
ditto

thanks,
Paley

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020, 5:42 PM Li Shen <[email protected]> wrote:

> -1
>
> The mnemonic project created a new durable object model. There is no other
> similar models to replace it.  I think it’s worth to continue and give it
> another chance to grow up.  Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Li
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Chenyang Li <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > -1, still see some great value in this project, Gary’s point is valid.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:42 PM Gary Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thank Craig for this vote call.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > My vote is -1, my 2 cents, because the JDK 9 and later have deprecated
> > the
> >
> > >
> >
> > > unsafe feature, that make the core functionalities hardly upgradable.
> but
> >
> > >
> >
> > > the JDK14 introduced a hybrid memory supporting feature recently, the
> new
> >
> > >
> >
> > > incubator feature looks provided the promising infrastructure for
> durable
> >
> > >
> >
> > > object model to migrate upon. I think it could be possible to bring
> dev.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > together.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Gary
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020, 3:10 PM Craig Russell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Dear members of the Mnemonic Community,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > tl;dr please reply to this message.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [ ] +1 retire the Mnemonic project
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [ ] -1 do not retire the Mnemonic project because...
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > I am getting in touch with the Mnemonic community members in regard
> to
> >
> > > the
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > health of the project.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > There appears to be some work being done but almost all of the
> activity
> >
> > > in
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > the last several months is from just one person. The most recent
> board
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > report states that one PMC member left in August 2020 but I was
> unable
> > to
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > find any evidence of this event.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > reduces to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Apache, projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3
> active
> >
> > > PMC
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > members providing oversight. Projects that reach this stage are
> usually
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > placed in the Attic [1] or absorbed by another Apache project willing
> > to
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > manage its releases.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > On the other hand, if your project has very low activity for good
> > reasons
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > and has at least three active PMC members willing to perform
> oversight,
> >
> > > it
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > can remain an Apache project so long as the Board is properly
> informed
> >
> > > and
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > the project remains open and welcoming to new contributors.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > There was a ROLL CALL last month to which only one PMC member
> > responded.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > At this time, I am requesting a formal VOTE of the Apache Mnemonic
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > community. If you feel that this project is still viable, and able to
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > reconstitute an active PMC with at least three members, please
> respond
> > to
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > this message accordingly. If you are a member of the PMC but have
> moved
> >
> > > on
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > or are no longer able to participate, please tell us so that the
> >
> > > project's
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > status is clear. Failure to respond will indicate a lack of interest
> in
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > oversight.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Please don't take this message as a criticism of the project or its
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > current chair. This is an expected event in the timeline of many open
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > source projects, and sometimes results in a renewed interest from the
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > development community.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Best regards,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Craig
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Director, The Apache Software Foundation
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [1] https://attic.apache.org/ <https://attic.apache.org/>
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > --
> >
> >         < = >
> >
> > LESS IS MORE
> >
> > --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>

Reply via email to