I have a comment.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 4, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Yanhui ZHAO <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks, Craig 
>  
> This is Yanhui Zhao and I am a PMC member. After last ROLL Call I have been 
> connecting with Gang through weekly meetings regarding the roadmap of 
> Mnemonic for our next steps, and we are drafting some topics including but 
> not limited information below. After finalizing the priorities list we will 
> send it out for the community reviews. 

You might grow your community if you had this discussion in email on your dev 
list.

>  
> As we are moving forward we hope a third current PMC member to work with us. 
> If no current PMC volunteers, we hope to absorb new PMC member if possible to 
> keep the project moving forward.  

Engage your dev community in the Apache Way on your dev list.

Regards,
Dave

>  
> Please take this as my -1 vote with the reasoning above, thanks 
>  
> BR 
>  
> Yanhui Zhao 
>  
> === 
> Project goal: 
> To deliver a pre-product durable object model library working with persistent 
> memory and high performance storage at the end of next year. 
>  
> Project objectives 
> 1) A stable and efficient CI system 
> 2) A improved documentation and website  
> 3) Integrated with Bytebuddy  
> 4) Supporting JDK14 and leveraging the feature of  non-volatile mapped byte 
> buffers (incubator)  
> 5) Adding Redis as one of backend of durable object 
> 6) Verified code quality and testing  
>  
> Highlights key values of our project is (1) provide unified interface for 
> storage(memory) backend, (2) remove se-des process to improve the access 
> speed thus improving read/write performance 
>  
> Project Milestones 
> 1) Dec. 2020, CI documentation and website (v0.14.0) 
> 2) May. 2021, Bytebuddy and JDK14 (v0.15.0) 
> 3) Oct. 2020, Redis backend and quality (v0.16.0) 
>  
> Project Communication 
> 1) Weekly regular meeting 30mins - 60 mins 
> 2) Event based release meeting 
> 3) Reporting meeting 
> 4) Maillist, Jira, PR based discussion 
> 5) Management meeting on demand 
> 
> From: Craig Russell <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 3:10 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Cc: Apache Board <[email protected]>
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Mnemonic retirement
>  
> Dear members of the Mnemonic Community,
> 
> tl;dr please reply to this message.
> 
> [ ] +1 retire the Mnemonic project
> [ ] -1 do not retire the Mnemonic project because...
> 
> I am getting in touch with the Mnemonic community members in regard to the 
> health of the project.
> 
> There appears to be some work being done but almost all of the activity in 
> the last several months is from just one person. The most recent board report 
> states that one PMC member left in August 2020 but I was unable to find any 
> evidence of this event.
> 
> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity reduces 
> to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache, 
> projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 active PMC members 
> providing oversight. Projects that reach this stage are usually placed in the 
> Attic [1] or absorbed by another Apache project willing to manage its 
> releases.
> 
> On the other hand, if your project has very low activity for good reasons and 
> has at least three active PMC members willing to perform oversight, it can 
> remain an Apache project so long as the Board is properly informed and the 
> project remains open and welcoming to new contributors.
> 
> There was a ROLL CALL last month to which only one PMC member responded.
> 
> At this time, I am requesting a formal VOTE of the Apache Mnemonic community. 
> If you feel that this project is still viable, and able to reconstitute an 
> active PMC with at least three members, please respond to this message 
> accordingly. If you are a member of the PMC but have moved on or are no 
> longer able to participate, please tell us so that the project's status is 
> clear. Failure to respond will indicate a lack of interest in oversight.
> 
> Please don't take this message as a criticism of the project or its current 
> chair. This is an expected event in the timeline of many open source 
> projects, and sometimes results in a renewed interest from the development 
> community.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Craig
> Director, The Apache Software Foundation
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> [1] https://attic.apache.org/ <https://attic.apache.org/>
> 
> 

Reply via email to