The following link might be useful for a meeting in weekend https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?pl=1&lid=30,8&h=8
I'm okay for a time slot at night, Thanks for scheduling On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:20 AM Kevin Ratnasekera <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Zhao, > > I will be able to allocate some time over the weekend, I am based in Sri > Lanka ( IST time ) so I am thinking whether it will work for others. Just > let me know what works best for you/others. > > I second what Dave mentioned, these need discussed on public threads and > have some visibility over it. I have also noticed people replying to this > email thread. Maybe we can encourage them to involve in these plans and > join them in contributing to the project. > > I also want to seek advice from the board as well, specifically on moving > forward, since there are no 3 PMC members active to even elect a single > external contributor. I would like to know the board process to > reconstitute an active PMC with at least three members in cases such as > this. > > Regards > Kevin > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:55 AM Yanhui ZHAO <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Kevin and folks >> >> Do you have time for a sync meeting over the weekend to discuss project >> planning and roadmap? >> >> Considering people may live in different time zone so please share the >> time you prefer so that we can best coordinate. >> >> Thanks and talk to you soon! >> >> Yanhui >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Kevin Ratnasekera <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, October 4, 2020 2:03 PM >> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] < >> [email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Mnemonic retirement >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> I have worked with Gang in the past, I have contributed to Apache >> Mnemonic during the past year. [1] I also noticed my contributions were >> recognized and proposed me as a committer to the project. [2] I was also a >> bit discouraged by the lack of activity by Mnemonic PMC except Gang, I >> couldn't continue my usual contributions. >> >> -1 from my end, I would also like to see this project moving forward with >> a plan mentioned. Zhao, Gang I would like to volunteer, if you need help >> from my end and couldn't find help from a 3rd member. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/mnemonic/commits?author=djkevincr >> [2] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/508a6710cd60320a8ffbc2035fd154cfbfa1fadc23320456afd11578%40%3Cprivate.mnemonic.apache.org%3E >> >> Regards >> Kevin >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:05 AM Yanhui ZHAO <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks, Craig >> >> >> >> This is Yanhui Zhao and I am a PMC member. After last ROLL Call I have >> been connecting with Gang through weekly meetings regarding the roadmap of >> Mnemonic for our next steps, and we are drafting some topics including but >> not limited information below. After finalizing the priorities list we will >> send it out for the community reviews. >> >> >> >> As we are moving forward we hope a third current PMC member to work with >> us. If no current PMC volunteers, we hope to absorb new PMC member if >> possible to keep the project moving forward. >> >> >> >> Please take this as my -1 vote with the reasoning above, thanks >> >> >> >> BR >> >> >> >> Yanhui Zhao >> >> >> >> === >> >> Project goal: >> >> To deliver a pre-product durable object model library working with >> persistent memory and high performance storage at the end of next year. >> >> >> >> Project objectives >> >> 1) A stable and efficient CI system >> >> 2) A improved documentation and website >> >> 3) Integrated with Bytebuddy >> >> 4) Supporting JDK14 and leveraging the feature of non-volatile mapped >> byte buffers (incubator) >> >> 5) Adding Redis as one of backend of durable object >> >> 6) Verified code quality and testing >> >> >> >> Highlights key values of our project is (1) provide unified interface for >> storage(memory) backend, (2) remove se-des process to improve the access >> speed thus improving read/write performance >> >> >> >> Project Milestones >> >> 1) Dec. 2020, CI documentation and website (v0.14.0) >> >> 2) May. 2021, Bytebuddy and JDK14 (v0.15.0) >> >> 3) Oct. 2020, Redis backend and quality (v0.16.0) >> >> >> >> Project Communication >> >> 1) Weekly regular meeting 30mins - 60 mins >> >> 2) Event based release meeting >> >> 3) Reporting meeting >> >> 4) Maillist, Jira, PR based discussion >> >> 5) Management meeting on demand >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Craig Russell <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, October 2, 2020 3:10 PM >> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* Apache Board <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* [VOTE] Apache Mnemonic retirement >> >> Dear members of the Mnemonic Community, >> >> tl;dr please reply to this message. >> >> [ ] +1 retire the Mnemonic project >> [ ] -1 do not retire the Mnemonic project because... >> >> I am getting in touch with the Mnemonic community members in regard to >> the health of the project. >> >> There appears to be some work being done but almost all of the activity >> in the last several months is from just one person. The most recent board >> report states that one PMC member left in August 2020 but I was unable to >> find any evidence of this event. >> >> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity >> reduces to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At >> Apache, projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 active PMC >> members providing oversight. Projects that reach this stage are usually >> placed in the Attic [1] or absorbed by another Apache project willing to >> manage its releases. >> >> On the other hand, if your project has very low activity for good reasons >> and has at least three active PMC members willing to perform oversight, it >> can remain an Apache project so long as the Board is properly informed and >> the project remains open and welcoming to new contributors. >> >> There was a ROLL CALL last month to which only one PMC member responded. >> >> At this time, I am requesting a formal VOTE of the Apache Mnemonic >> community. If you feel that this project is still viable, and able to >> reconstitute an active PMC with at least three members, please respond to >> this message accordingly. If you are a member of the PMC but have moved on >> or are no longer able to participate, please tell us so that the project's >> status is clear. Failure to respond will indicate a lack of interest in >> oversight. >> >> Please don't take this message as a criticism of the project or its >> current chair. This is an expected event in the timeline of many open >> source projects, and sometimes results in a renewed interest from the >> development community. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Craig >> Director, The Apache Software Foundation >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>> >> >> [1] https://attic.apache.org/ <https://attic.apache.org/> >> >> >>
